Register   Login   About   Study   Enterprise   Share
Internet / AI Technology University (ITU/AITU)
Fast Login - available after registration







|

Top Links: >> 80. Technology >> Internet Technology Summit Program >> 9. AI with Python >> 9.1. The Python Tutorial Introduction >> 9.1.1. Python Docs, Lexicon, and Components >> 9.1.1.2. Python Lexicon and Components
Current Topic: 9.1.1.2.4. Simple statements
You have a privilege to create a quiz (QnA) related to this subject and obtain creativity score...

A simple statement is comprised within a single logical line. Several simple statements may occur on a single line separated by semicolons. The syntax for simple statements is:


simple_stmt ::=  expression_stmt
| assert_stmt
| assignment_stmt
| augmented_assignment_stmt
| annotated_assignment_stmt
| pass_stmt
| del_stmt
| return_stmt
| yield_stmt
| raise_stmt
| break_stmt
| continue_stmt
| import_stmt
| future_stmt
| global_stmt
| nonlocal_stmt



7.1. Expression statements



Expression statements are used (mostly interactively) to compute and write a value, or (usually) to call a procedure (a function that returns no meaningful result; in Python, procedures return the value None). Other uses of expression statements are allowed and occasionally useful. The syntax for an expression statement is:


expression_stmt ::=  starred_expression

An expression statement evaluates the expression list (which may be a single expression).


In interactive mode, if the value is not None, it is converted to a string using the built-in repr() function and the resulting string is written to standard output on a line by itself (except if the result is None, so that procedure calls do not cause any output.)





7.2. Assignment statements


Assignment statements are used to (re)bind names to values and to modify attributes or items of mutable objects:


assignment_stmt ::=  (target_list "=")+ (starred_expression | yield_expression)
target_list ::= target ("," target)* [","]
target ::= identifier
| "(" [target_list] ")"
| "[" [target_list] "]"
| attributeref
| subscription
| slicing
| "*" target

(See section Primaries for the syntax definitions for attributeref, subscription, and slicing.)


An assignment statement evaluates the expression list (remember that this can be a single expression or a comma-separated list, the latter yielding a tuple) and assigns the single resulting object to each of the target lists, from left to right.


Assignment is defined recursively depending on the form of the target (list). When a target is part of a mutable object (an attribute reference, subscription or slicing), the mutable object must ultimately perform the assignment and decide about its validity, and may raise an exception if the assignment is unacceptable. The rules observed by various types and the exceptions raised are given with the definition of the object types (see section The standard type hierarchy).


Assignment of an object to a target list, optionally enclosed in parentheses or square brackets, is recursively defined as follows.



Assignment of an object to a single target is recursively defined as follows.




CPython implementation detail: In the current implementation, the syntax for targets is taken to be the same as for expressions, and invalid syntax is rejected during the code generation phase, causing less detailed error messages.



Although the definition of assignment implies that overlaps between the left-hand side and the right-hand side are 'simultaneous? (for example a, b = b, a swaps two variables), overlaps within the collection of assigned-to variables occur left-to-right, sometimes resulting in confusion. For instance, the following program prints [0, 2]:




x = [0, 1]
i = 0
i, x[i] = 1, 2 # i is updated, then x[i] is updated
print(x)




See also





PEP 3132 - Extended Iterable Unpacking


The specification for the *target feature.







7.2.1. Augmented assignment statements


Augmented assignment is the combination, in a single statement, of a binary operation and an assignment statement:


augmented_assignment_stmt ::=  augtarget augop (expression_list | yield_expression)
augtarget ::= identifier | attributeref | subscription | slicing
augop ::= "+=" | "-=" | "*=" | "@=" | "/=" | "//=" | "%=" | "**="
| ">>=" | "<<=" | "&=" | "^=" | "|="

(See section Primaries for the syntax definitions of the last three symbols.)


An augmented assignment evaluates the target (which, unlike normal assignment statements, cannot be an unpacking) and the expression list, performs the binary operation specific to the type of assignment on the two operands, and assigns the result to the original target. The target is only evaluated once.


An augmented assignment expression like x += 1 can be rewritten as x = x + 1 to achieve a similar, but not exactly equal effect. In the augmented version, x is only evaluated once. Also, when possible, the actual operation is performed in-place, meaning that rather than creating a new object and assigning that to the target, the old object is modified instead.


Unlike normal assignments, augmented assignments evaluate the left-hand side before evaluating the right-hand side. For example, a[i] += f(x) first looks-up a[i], then it evaluates f(x) and performs the addition, and lastly, it writes the result back to a[i].


With the exception of assigning to tuples and multiple targets in a single statement, the assignment done by augmented assignment statements is handled the same way as normal assignments. Similarly, with the exception of the possible in-place behavior, the binary operation performed by augmented assignment is the same as the normal binary operations.


For targets which are attribute references, the same caveat about class and instance attributes applies as for regular assignments.





7.2.2. Annotated assignment statements


Annotation assignment is the combination, in a single statement, of a variable or attribute annotation and an optional assignment statement:


annotated_assignment_stmt ::=  augtarget ":" expression
["=" (starred_expression | yield_expression)]

The difference from normal Assignment statements is that only single target is allowed.


For simple names as assignment targets, if in class or module scope, the annotations are evaluated and stored in a special class or module attribute __annotations__ that is a dictionary mapping from variable names (mangled if private) to evaluated annotations. This attribute is writable and is automatically created at the start of class or module body execution, if annotations are found statically.


For expressions as assignment targets, the annotations are evaluated if in class or module scope, but not stored.


If a name is annotated in a function scope, then this name is local for that scope. Annotations are never evaluated and stored in function scopes.


If the right hand side is present, an annotated assignment performs the actual assignment before evaluating annotations (where applicable). If the right hand side is not present for an expression target, then the interpreter evaluates the target except for the last __setitem__() or __setattr__() call.



See also





PEP 526 - Syntax for Variable Annotations


The proposal that added syntax for annotating the types of variables (including class variables and instance variables), instead of expressing them through comments.





PEP 484 - Type hints


The proposal that added the typing module to provide a standard syntax for type annotations that can be used in static analysis tools and IDEs.






Changed in version 3.8: Now annotated assignments allow same expressions in the right hand side as the regular assignments. Previously, some expressions (like un-parenthesized tuple expressions) caused a syntax error.







7.3. The assert statement


Assert statements are a convenient way to insert debugging assertions into a program:


assert_stmt ::=  "assert" expression ["," expression]

The simple form, assert expression, is equivalent to




if __debug__:
if not expression: raise AssertionError



The extended form, assert expression1, expression2, is equivalent to




if __debug__:
if not expression1: raise AssertionError(expression2)



These equivalences assume that __debug__ and AssertionError refer to the built-in variables with those names. In the current implementation, the built-in variable __debug__ is True under normal circumstances, False when optimization is requested (command line option -O). The current code generator emits no code for an assert statement when optimization is requested at compile time. Note that it is unnecessary to include the source code for the expression that failed in the error message; it will be displayed as part of the stack trace.


Assignments to __debug__ are illegal. The value for the built-in variable is determined when the interpreter starts.





7.4. The pass statement


pass_stmt ::=  "pass"

pass is a null operation ? when it is executed, nothing happens. It is useful as a placeholder when a statement is required syntactically, but no code needs to be executed, for example:




def f(arg): pass    # a function that does nothing (yet)

class C: pass # a class with no methods (yet)






7.5. The del statement


del_stmt ::=  "del" target_list

Deletion is recursively defined very similar to the way assignment is defined. Rather than spelling it out in full details, here are some hints.


Deletion of a target list recursively deletes each target, from left to right.


Deletion of a name removes the binding of that name from the local or global namespace, depending on whether the name occurs in a global statement in the same code block. If the name is unbound, a NameError exception will be raised.


Deletion of attribute references, subscriptions and slicings is passed to the primary object involved; deletion of a slicing is in general equivalent to assignment of an empty slice of the right type (but even this is determined by the sliced object).



Changed in version 3.2: Previously it was illegal to delete a name from the local namespace if it occurs as a free variable in a nested block.






7.6. The return statement


return_stmt ::=  "return" [expression_list]

return may only occur syntactically nested in a function definition, not within a nested class definition.


If an expression list is present, it is evaluated, else None is substituted.


return leaves the current function call with the expression list (or None) as return value.


When return passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really leaving the function.


In a generator function, the return statement indicates that the generator is done and will cause StopIteration to be raised. The returned value (if any) is used as an argument to construct StopIteration and becomes the StopIteration.value attribute.


In an asynchronous generator function, an empty return statement indicates that the asynchronous generator is done and will cause StopAsyncIteration to be raised. A non-empty return statement is a syntax error in an asynchronous generator function.





7.7. The yield statement


yield_stmt ::=  yield_expression

A yield statement is semantically equivalent to a yield expression. The yield statement can be used to omit the parentheses that would otherwise be required in the equivalent yield expression statement. For example, the yield statements




yield <expr>
yield from <expr>



are equivalent to the yield expression statements




(yield <expr>)
(yield from <expr>)


Was it clear so far?

Yield expressions and statements are only used when defining a generator function, and are only used in the body of the generator function. Using yield in a function definition is sufficient to cause that definition to create a generator function instead of a normal function.


For full details of yield semantics, refer to the Yield expressions section.





7.8. The raise statement


raise_stmt ::=  "raise" [expression ["from" expression]]

If no expressions are present, raise re-raises the last exception that was active in the current scope. If no exception is active in the current scope, a RuntimeError exception is raised indicating that this is an error.


Otherwise, raise evaluates the first expression as the exception object. It must be either a subclass or an instance of BaseException. If it is a class, the exception instance will be obtained when needed by instantiating the class with no arguments.


The type of the exception is the exception instance's class, the value is the instance itself.


A traceback object is normally created automatically when an exception is raised and attached to it as the __traceback__ attribute, which is writable. You can create an exception and set your own traceback in one step using the with_traceback() exception method (which returns the same exception instance, with its traceback set to its argument), like so:




raise Exception("foo occurred").with_traceback(tracebackobj)



The from clause is used for exception chaining: if given, the second expression must be another exception class or instance, which will then be attached to the raised exception as the __cause__ attribute (which is writable). If the raised exception is not handled, both exceptions will be printed:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except Exception as exc:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened") from exc
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



A similar mechanism works implicitly if an exception is raised inside an exception handler or a finally clause: the previous exception is then attached as the new exception's __context__ attribute:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened")
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



Exception chaining can be explicitly suppressed by specifying None in the from clause:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened") from None
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



Additional information on exceptions can be found in section Exceptions, and information about handling exceptions is in section The try statement.



Changed in version 3.3: None is now permitted as Y in raise X from Y.




New in version 3.3: The __suppress_context__ attribute to suppress automatic display of the exception context.






7.9. The break statement


break_stmt ::=  "break"

break may only occur syntactically nested in a for or while loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that loop.


It terminates the nearest enclosing loop, skipping the optional else clause if the loop has one.


If a for loop is terminated by break, the loop control target keeps its current value.


When break passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really leaving the loop.





7.10. The continue statement


continue_stmt ::=  "continue"

continue may only occur syntactically nested in a for or while loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that loop. It continues with the next cycle of the nearest enclosing loop.


When continue passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really starting the next loop cycle.






7.11. The import statement


import_stmt     ::=  "import" module ["as" identifier] ("," module ["as" identifier])*
| "from" relative_module "import" identifier ["as" identifier]
("," identifier ["as" identifier])*
| "from" relative_module "import" "(" identifier ["as" identifier]
("," identifier ["as" identifier])* [","] ")"
| "from" module "import" "*"
module ::= (identifier ".")* identifier
relative_module ::= "."* module | "."+

The basic import statement (no from clause) is executed in two steps:



  1. find a module, loading and initializing it if necessary


  2. define a name or names in the local namespace for the scope where the import statement occurs.



When the statement contains multiple clauses (separated by commas) the two steps are carried out separately for each clause, just as though the clauses had been separated out into individual import statements.


The details of the first step, finding and loading modules are described in greater detail in the section on the import system, which also describes the various types of packages and modules that can be imported, as well as all the hooks that can be used to customize the import system. Note that failures in this step may indicate either that the module could not be located, or that an error occurred while initializing the module, which includes execution of the module's code.


If the requested module is retrieved successfully, it will be made available in the local namespace in one of three ways:



The from form uses a slightly more complex process:



  1. find the module specified in the from clause, loading and initializing it if necessary;


  2. for each of the identifiers specified in the import clauses:



    1. check if the imported module has an attribute by that name


    2. if not, attempt to import a submodule with that name and then check the imported module again for that attribute


    3. if the attribute is not found, ImportError is raised.


    4. otherwise, a reference to that value is stored in the local namespace, using the name in the as clause if it is present, otherwise using the attribute name




Examples:




import foo                 # foo imported and bound locally
import foo.bar.baz # foo.bar.baz imported, foo bound locally
import foo.bar.baz as fbb # foo.bar.baz imported and bound as fbb
from foo.bar import baz # foo.bar.baz imported and bound as baz
from foo import attr # foo imported and foo.attr bound as attr



If the list of identifiers is replaced by a star ('*'), all public names defined in the module are bound in the local namespace for the scope where the import statement occurs.


The public names defined by a module are determined by checking the module's namespace for a variable named __all__; if defined, it must be a sequence of strings which are names defined or imported by that module. The names given in __all__ are all considered public and are required to exist. If __all__ is not defined, the set of public names includes all names found in the module's namespace which do not begin with an underscore character ('_'). __all__ should contain the entire public API. It is intended to avoid accidentally exporting items that are not part of the API (such as library modules which were imported and used within the module).


The wild card form of import ? from module import * ? is only allowed at the module level. Attempting to use it in class or function definitions will raise a SyntaxError.


When specifying what module to import you do not have to specify the absolute name of the module. When a module or package is contained within another package it is possible to make a relative import within the same top package without having to mention the package name. By using leading dots in the specified module or package after from you can specify how high to traverse up the current package hierarchy without specifying exact names. One leading dot means the current package where the module making the import exists. Two dots means up one package level. Three dots is up two levels, etc. So if you execute from . import mod from a module in the pkg package then you will end up importing pkg.mod. If you execute from ..subpkg2 import mod from within pkg.subpkg1 you will import pkg.subpkg2.mod. The specification for relative imports is contained in the Package Relative Imports section.


importlib.import_module() is provided to support applications that determine dynamically the modules to be loaded.


Raises an auditing event import with arguments module, filename, sys.path, sys.meta_path, sys.path_hooks.




7.11.1. Future statements


A future statement is a directive to the compiler that a particular module should be compiled using syntax or semantics that will be available in a specified future release of Python where the feature becomes standard.


The future statement is intended to ease migration to future versions of Python that introduce incompatible changes to the language. It allows use of the new features on a per-module basis before the release in which the feature becomes standard.


future_stmt ::=  "from" "__future__" "import" feature ["as" identifier]
("," feature ["as" identifier])*
| "from" "__future__" "import" "(" feature ["as" identifier]
("," feature ["as" identifier])* [","] ")"
feature ::= identifier

A future statement must appear near the top of the module. The only lines that can appear before a future statement are:



  • the module docstring (if any),


  • comments,


  • blank lines, and


  • other future statements.



The only feature in Python 3.7 that requires using the future statement is annotations.


All historical features enabled by the future statement are still recognized by Python 3. The list includes absolute_import, division, generators, generator_stop, unicode_literals, print_function, nested_scopes and with_statement. They are all redundant because they are always enabled, and only kept for backwards compatibility.


A future statement is recognized and treated specially at compile time: Changes to the semantics of core constructs are often implemented by generating different code. It may even be the case that a new feature introduces new incompatible syntax (such as a new reserved word), in which case the compiler may need to parse the module differently. Such decisions cannot be pushed off until runtime.


For any given release, the compiler knows which feature names have been defined, and raises a compile-time error if a future statement contains a feature not known to it.


The direct runtime semantics are the same as for any import statement: there is a standard module __future__, described later, and it will be imported in the usual way at the time the future statement is executed.


The interesting runtime semantics depend on the specific feature enabled by the future statement.


Note that there is nothing special about the statement:




import __future__ [as name]



That is not a future statement; it's an ordinary import statement with no special semantics or syntax restrictions.


Code compiled by calls to the built-in functions exec() and compile() that occur in a module M containing a future statement will, by default, use the new syntax or semantics associated with the future statement. This can be controlled by optional arguments to compile() ? see the documentation of that function for details.


A future statement typed at an interactive interpreter prompt will take effect for the rest of the interpreter session. If an interpreter is started with the -i option, is passed a script name to execute, and the script includes a future statement, it will be in effect in the interactive session started after the script is executed.



See also





PEP 236 - Back to the __future__


The original proposal for the __future__ mechanism.









7.12. The global statement


global_stmt ::=  "global" identifier ("," identifier)*

The global statement is a declaration which holds for the entire current code block. It means that the listed identifiers are to be interpreted as globals. It would be impossible to assign to a global variable without global, although free variables may refer to globals without being declared global.


Names listed in a global statement must not be used in the same code block textually preceding that global statement.


Names listed in a global statement must not be defined as formal parameters or in a for loop control target, class definition, function definition, import statement, or variable annotation.



CPython implementation detail: The current implementation does not enforce some of these restrictions, but programs should not abuse this freedom, as future implementations may enforce them or silently change the meaning of the program.



Programmer's note: global is a directive to the parser. It applies only to code parsed at the same time as the global statement. In particular, a global statement contained in a string or code object supplied to the built-in exec() function does not affect the code block containing the function call, and code contained in such a string is unaffected by global statements in the code containing the function call. The same applies to the eval() and compile() functions.





7.13. The nonlocal statement


nonlocal_stmt ::=  "nonlocal" identifier ("," identifier)*

The nonlocal statement causes the listed identifiers to refer to previously bound variables in the nearest enclosing scope excluding globals. This is important because the default behavior for binding is to search the local namespace first. The statement allows encapsulated code to rebind variables outside of the local scope besides the global (module) scope.


Names listed in a nonlocal statement, unlike those listed in a global statement, must refer to pre-existing bindings in an enclosing scope (the scope in which a new binding should be created cannot be determined unambiguously).


Names listed in a nonlocal statement must not collide with pre-existing bindings in the local scope.



See also





PEP 3104 - Access to Names in Outer Scopes


The specification for the nonlocal statement.










| Check Your Progress | Propose QnA | Have a question or comments for open discussion?
simple_stmt ::=  expression_stmt
| assert_stmt
| assignment_stmt
| augmented_assignment_stmt
| annotated_assignment_stmt
| pass_stmt
| del_stmt
| return_stmt
| yield_stmt
| raise_stmt
| break_stmt
| continue_stmt
| import_stmt
| future_stmt
| global_stmt
| nonlocal_stmt



7.1. Expression statements



Expression statements are used (mostly interactively) to compute and write a value, or (usually) to call a procedure (a function that returns no meaningful result; in Python, procedures return the value None). Other uses of expression statements are allowed and occasionally useful. The syntax for an expression statement is:


expression_stmt ::=  starred_expression

An expression statement evaluates the expression list (which may be a single expression).


In interactive mode, if the value is not None, it is converted to a string using the built-in repr() function and the resulting string is written to standard output on a line by itself (except if the result is None, so that procedure calls do not cause any output.)





7.2. Assignment statements


Assignment statements are used to (re)bind names to values and to modify attributes or items of mutable objects:


assignment_stmt ::=  (target_list "=")+ (starred_expression | yield_expression)
target_list ::= target ("," target)* [","]
target ::= identifier
| "(" [target_list] ")"
| "[" [target_list] "]"
| attributeref
| subscription
| slicing
| "*" target

(See section Primaries for the syntax definitions for attributeref, subscription, and slicing.)


An assignment statement evaluates the expression list (remember that this can be a single expression or a comma-separated list, the latter yielding a tuple) and assigns the single resulting object to each of the target lists, from left to right.


Assignment is defined recursively depending on the form of the target (list). When a target is part of a mutable object (an attribute reference, subscription or slicing), the mutable object must ultimately perform the assignment and decide about its validity, and may raise an exception if the assignment is unacceptable. The rules observed by various types and the exceptions raised are given with the definition of the object types (see section The standard type hierarchy).


Assignment of an object to a target list, optionally enclosed in parentheses or square brackets, is recursively defined as follows.



Assignment of an object to a single target is recursively defined as follows.




CPython implementation detail: In the current implementation, the syntax for targets is taken to be the same as for expressions, and invalid syntax is rejected during the code generation phase, causing less detailed error messages.



Although the definition of assignment implies that overlaps between the left-hand side and the right-hand side are 'simultaneous? (for example a, b = b, a swaps two variables), overlaps within the collection of assigned-to variables occur left-to-right, sometimes resulting in confusion. For instance, the following program prints [0, 2]:




x = [0, 1]
i = 0
i, x[i] = 1, 2 # i is updated, then x[i] is updated
print(x)




See also





PEP 3132 - Extended Iterable Unpacking


The specification for the *target feature.







7.2.1. Augmented assignment statements


Augmented assignment is the combination, in a single statement, of a binary operation and an assignment statement:


augmented_assignment_stmt ::=  augtarget augop (expression_list | yield_expression)
augtarget ::= identifier | attributeref | subscription | slicing
augop ::= "+=" | "-=" | "*=" | "@=" | "/=" | "//=" | "%=" | "**="
| ">>=" | "<<=" | "&=" | "^=" | "|="

(See section Primaries for the syntax definitions of the last three symbols.)


An augmented assignment evaluates the target (which, unlike normal assignment statements, cannot be an unpacking) and the expression list, performs the binary operation specific to the type of assignment on the two operands, and assigns the result to the original target. The target is only evaluated once.


An augmented assignment expression like x += 1 can be rewritten as x = x + 1 to achieve a similar, but not exactly equal effect. In the augmented version, x is only evaluated once. Also, when possible, the actual operation is performed in-place, meaning that rather than creating a new object and assigning that to the target, the old object is modified instead.


Unlike normal assignments, augmented assignments evaluate the left-hand side before evaluating the right-hand side. For example, a[i] += f(x) first looks-up a[i], then it evaluates f(x) and performs the addition, and lastly, it writes the result back to a[i].


With the exception of assigning to tuples and multiple targets in a single statement, the assignment done by augmented assignment statements is handled the same way as normal assignments. Similarly, with the exception of the possible in-place behavior, the binary operation performed by augmented assignment is the same as the normal binary operations.


For targets which are attribute references, the same caveat about class and instance attributes applies as for regular assignments.





7.2.2. Annotated assignment statements


Annotation assignment is the combination, in a single statement, of a variable or attribute annotation and an optional assignment statement:


annotated_assignment_stmt ::=  augtarget ":" expression
["=" (starred_expression | yield_expression)]

The difference from normal Assignment statements is that only single target is allowed.


For simple names as assignment targets, if in class or module scope, the annotations are evaluated and stored in a special class or module attribute __annotations__ that is a dictionary mapping from variable names (mangled if private) to evaluated annotations. This attribute is writable and is automatically created at the start of class or module body execution, if annotations are found statically.


For expressions as assignment targets, the annotations are evaluated if in class or module scope, but not stored.


If a name is annotated in a function scope, then this name is local for that scope. Annotations are never evaluated and stored in function scopes.


If the right hand side is present, an annotated assignment performs the actual assignment before evaluating annotations (where applicable). If the right hand side is not present for an expression target, then the interpreter evaluates the target except for the last __setitem__() or __setattr__() call.



See also





PEP 526 - Syntax for Variable Annotations


The proposal that added syntax for annotating the types of variables (including class variables and instance variables), instead of expressing them through comments.





PEP 484 - Type hints


The proposal that added the typing module to provide a standard syntax for type annotations that can be used in static analysis tools and IDEs.






Changed in version 3.8: Now annotated assignments allow same expressions in the right hand side as the regular assignments. Previously, some expressions (like un-parenthesized tuple expressions) caused a syntax error.







7.3. The assert statement


Assert statements are a convenient way to insert debugging assertions into a program:


assert_stmt ::=  "assert" expression ["," expression]

The simple form, assert expression, is equivalent to




if __debug__:
if not expression: raise AssertionError



The extended form, assert expression1, expression2, is equivalent to




if __debug__:
if not expression1: raise AssertionError(expression2)



These equivalences assume that __debug__ and AssertionError refer to the built-in variables with those names. In the current implementation, the built-in variable __debug__ is True under normal circumstances, False when optimization is requested (command line option -O). The current code generator emits no code for an assert statement when optimization is requested at compile time. Note that it is unnecessary to include the source code for the expression that failed in the error message; it will be displayed as part of the stack trace.


Assignments to __debug__ are illegal. The value for the built-in variable is determined when the interpreter starts.





7.4. The pass statement


pass_stmt ::=  "pass"

pass is a null operation ? when it is executed, nothing happens. It is useful as a placeholder when a statement is required syntactically, but no code needs to be executed, for example:




def f(arg): pass    # a function that does nothing (yet)

class C: pass # a class with no methods (yet)






7.5. The del statement


del_stmt ::=  "del" target_list

Deletion is recursively defined very similar to the way assignment is defined. Rather than spelling it out in full details, here are some hints.


Deletion of a target list recursively deletes each target, from left to right.


Deletion of a name removes the binding of that name from the local or global namespace, depending on whether the name occurs in a global statement in the same code block. If the name is unbound, a NameError exception will be raised.


Deletion of attribute references, subscriptions and slicings is passed to the primary object involved; deletion of a slicing is in general equivalent to assignment of an empty slice of the right type (but even this is determined by the sliced object).



Changed in version 3.2: Previously it was illegal to delete a name from the local namespace if it occurs as a free variable in a nested block.






7.6. The return statement


return_stmt ::=  "return" [expression_list]

return may only occur syntactically nested in a function definition, not within a nested class definition.


If an expression list is present, it is evaluated, else None is substituted.


return leaves the current function call with the expression list (or None) as return value.


When return passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really leaving the function.


In a generator function, the return statement indicates that the generator is done and will cause StopIteration to be raised. The returned value (if any) is used as an argument to construct StopIteration and becomes the StopIteration.value attribute.


In an asynchronous generator function, an empty return statement indicates that the asynchronous generator is done and will cause StopAsyncIteration to be raised. A non-empty return statement is a syntax error in an asynchronous generator function.





7.7. The yield statement


yield_stmt ::=  yield_expression

A yield statement is semantically equivalent to a yield expression. The yield statement can be used to omit the parentheses that would otherwise be required in the equivalent yield expression statement. For example, the yield statements




yield <expr>
yield from <expr>



are equivalent to the yield expression statements




(yield <expr>)
(yield from <expr>)








Was it clear so far?


Yield expressions and statements are only used when defining a generator function, and are only used in the body of the generator function. Using yield in a function definition is sufficient to cause that definition to create a generator function instead of a normal function.


For full details of yield semantics, refer to the Yield expressions section.





7.8. The raise statement


raise_stmt ::=  "raise" [expression ["from" expression]]

If no expressions are present, raise re-raises the last exception that was active in the current scope. If no exception is active in the current scope, a RuntimeError exception is raised indicating that this is an error.


Otherwise, raise evaluates the first expression as the exception object. It must be either a subclass or an instance of BaseException. If it is a class, the exception instance will be obtained when needed by instantiating the class with no arguments.


The type of the exception is the exception instance's class, the value is the instance itself.


A traceback object is normally created automatically when an exception is raised and attached to it as the __traceback__ attribute, which is writable. You can create an exception and set your own traceback in one step using the with_traceback() exception method (which returns the same exception instance, with its traceback set to its argument), like so:




raise Exception("foo occurred").with_traceback(tracebackobj)



The from clause is used for exception chaining: if given, the second expression must be another exception class or instance, which will then be attached to the raised exception as the __cause__ attribute (which is writable). If the raised exception is not handled, both exceptions will be printed:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except Exception as exc:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened") from exc
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



A similar mechanism works implicitly if an exception is raised inside an exception handler or a finally clause: the previous exception is then attached as the new exception's __context__ attribute:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened")
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



Exception chaining can be explicitly suppressed by specifying None in the from clause:




>>> try:
... print(1 / 0)
... except:
... raise RuntimeError("Something bad happened") from None
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 4, in <module>
RuntimeError: Something bad happened



Additional information on exceptions can be found in section Exceptions, and information about handling exceptions is in section The try statement.



Changed in version 3.3: None is now permitted as Y in raise X from Y.




New in version 3.3: The __suppress_context__ attribute to suppress automatic display of the exception context.






7.9. The break statement


break_stmt ::=  "break"

break may only occur syntactically nested in a for or while loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that loop.


It terminates the nearest enclosing loop, skipping the optional else clause if the loop has one.


If a for loop is terminated by break, the loop control target keeps its current value.


When break passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really leaving the loop.





7.10. The continue statement


continue_stmt ::=  "continue"

continue may only occur syntactically nested in a for or while loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that loop. It continues with the next cycle of the nearest enclosing loop.


When continue passes control out of a try statement with a finally clause, that finally clause is executed before really starting the next loop cycle.






7.11. The import statement


import_stmt     ::=  "import" module ["as" identifier] ("," module ["as" identifier])*
| "from" relative_module "import" identifier ["as" identifier]
("," identifier ["as" identifier])*
| "from" relative_module "import" "(" identifier ["as" identifier]
("," identifier ["as" identifier])* [","] ")"
| "from" module "import" "*"
module ::= (identifier ".")* identifier
relative_module ::= "."* module | "."+

The basic import statement (no from clause) is executed in two steps:



  1. find a module, loading and initializing it if necessary


  2. define a name or names in the local namespace for the scope where the import statement occurs.



When the statement contains multiple clauses (separated by commas) the two steps are carried out separately for each clause, just as though the clauses had been separated out into individual import statements.


The details of the first step, finding and loading modules are described in greater detail in the section on the import system, which also describes the various types of packages and modules that can be imported, as well as all the hooks that can be used to customize the import system. Note that failures in this step may indicate either that the module could not be located, or that an error occurred while initializing the module, which includes execution of the module's code.


If the requested module is retrieved successfully, it will be made available in the local namespace in one of three ways:



The from form uses a slightly more complex process:



  1. find the module specified in the from clause, loading and initializing it if necessary;


  2. for each of the identifiers specified in the import clauses:



    1. check if the imported module has an attribute by that name


    2. if not, attempt to import a submodule with that name and then check the imported module again for that attribute


    3. if the attribute is not found, ImportError is raised.


    4. otherwise, a reference to that value is stored in the local namespace, using the name in the as clause if it is present, otherwise using the attribute name




Examples:




import foo                 # foo imported and bound locally
import foo.bar.baz # foo.bar.baz imported, foo bound locally
import foo.bar.baz as fbb # foo.bar.baz imported and bound as fbb
from foo.bar import baz # foo.bar.baz imported and bound as baz
from foo import attr # foo imported and foo.attr bound as attr



If the list of identifiers is replaced by a star ('*'), all public names defined in the module are bound in the local namespace for the scope where the import statement occurs.


The public names defined by a module are determined by checking the module's namespace for a variable named __all__; if defined, it must be a sequence of strings which are names defined or imported by that module. The names given in __all__ are all considered public and are required to exist. If __all__ is not defined, the set of public names includes all names found in the module's namespace which do not begin with an underscore character ('_'). __all__ should contain the entire public API. It is intended to avoid accidentally exporting items that are not part of the API (such as library modules which were imported and used within the module).


The wild card form of import ? from module import * ? is only allowed at the module level. Attempting to use it in class or function definitions will raise a SyntaxError.


When specifying what module to import you do not have to specify the absolute name of the module. When a module or package is contained within another package it is possible to make a relative import within the same top package without having to mention the package name. By using leading dots in the specified module or package after from you can specify how high to traverse up the current package hierarchy without specifying exact names. One leading dot means the current package where the module making the import exists. Two dots means up one package level. Three dots is up two levels, etc. So if you execute from . import mod from a module in the pkg package then you will end up importing pkg.mod. If you execute from ..subpkg2 import mod from within pkg.subpkg1 you will import pkg.subpkg2.mod. The specification for relative imports is contained in the Package Relative Imports section.


importlib.import_module() is provided to support applications that determine dynamically the modules to be loaded.


Raises an auditing event import with arguments module, filename, sys.path, sys.meta_path, sys.path_hooks.




7.11.1. Future statements


A future statement is a directive to the compiler that a particular module should be compiled using syntax or semantics that will be available in a specified future release of Python where the feature becomes standard.


The future statement is intended to ease migration to future versions of Python that introduce incompatible changes to the language. It allows use of the new features on a per-module basis before the release in which the feature becomes standard.


future_stmt ::=  "from" "__future__" "import" feature ["as" identifier]
("," feature ["as" identifier])*
| "from" "__future__" "import" "(" feature ["as" identifier]
("," feature ["as" identifier])* [","] ")"
feature ::= identifier

A future statement must appear near the top of the module. The only lines that can appear before a future statement are:



The only feature in Python 3.7 that requires using the future statement is annotations.


All historical features enabled by the future statement are still recognized by Python 3. The list includes absolute_import, division, generators, generator_stop, unicode_literals, print_function, nested_scopes and with_statement. They are all redundant because they are always enabled, and only kept for backwards compatibility.


A future statement is recognized and treated specially at compile time: Changes to the semantics of core constructs are often implemented by generating different code. It may even be the case that a new feature introduces new incompatible syntax (such as a new reserved word), in which case the compiler may need to parse the module differently. Such decisions cannot be pushed off until runtime.


For any given release, the compiler knows which feature names have been defined, and raises a compile-time error if a future statement contains a feature not known to it.


The direct runtime semantics are the same as for any import statement: there is a standard module __future__, described later, and it will be imported in the usual way at the time the future statement is executed.


The interesting runtime semantics depend on the specific feature enabled by the future statement.


Note that there is nothing special about the statement:




import __future__ [as name]



That is not a future statement; it's an ordinary import statement with no special semantics or syntax restrictions.


Code compiled by calls to the built-in functions exec() and compile() that occur in a module M containing a future statement will, by default, use the new syntax or semantics associated with the future statement. This can be controlled by optional arguments to compile() ? see the documentation of that function for details.


A future statement typed at an interactive interpreter prompt will take effect for the rest of the interpreter session. If an interpreter is started with the -i option, is passed a script name to execute, and the script includes a future statement, it will be in effect in the interactive session started after the script is executed.



See also





PEP 236 - Back to the __future__


The original proposal for the __future__ mechanism.









7.12. The global statement


global_stmt ::=  "global" identifier ("," identifier)*

The global statement is a declaration which holds for the entire current code block. It means that the listed identifiers are to be interpreted as globals. It would be impossible to assign to a global variable without global, although free variables may refer to globals without being declared global.


Names listed in a global statement must not be used in the same code block textually preceding that global statement.


Names listed in a global statement must not be defined as formal parameters or in a for loop control target, class definition, function definition, import statement, or variable annotation.



CPython implementation detail: The current implementation does not enforce some of these restrictions, but programs should not abuse this freedom, as future implementations may enforce them or silently change the meaning of the program.



Programmer's note: global is a directive to the parser. It applies only to code parsed at the same time as the global statement. In particular, a global statement contained in a string or code object supplied to the built-in exec() function does not affect the code block containing the function call, and code contained in such a string is unaffected by global statements in the code containing the function call. The same applies to the eval() and compile() functions.





7.13. The nonlocal statement


nonlocal_stmt ::=  "nonlocal" identifier ("," identifier)*

The nonlocal statement causes the listed identifiers to refer to previously bound variables in the nearest enclosing scope excluding globals. This is important because the default behavior for binding is to search the local namespace first. The statement allows encapsulated code to rebind variables outside of the local scope besides the global (module) scope.


Names listed in a nonlocal statement, unlike those listed in a global statement, must refer to pre-existing bindings in an enclosing scope (the scope in which a new binding should be created cannot be determined unambiguously).


Names listed in a nonlocal statement must not collide with pre-existing bindings in the local scope.



See also





PEP 3104 - Access to Names in Outer Scopes


The specification for the nonlocal statement.











| Check Your Progress | Propose QnA | Have a question or comments for open discussion?

Have a suggestion? - shoot an email
Looking for something special? - Talk to me
Read: IT of the future: AI and Semantic Cloud Architecture | Fixing Education
Do you want to move from theory to practice and become a magician? Learn and work with us at Internet Technology University (ITU) - JavaSchool.com.

Technology that we offer and How this works: English | Spanish | Russian | French

Internet Technology University | JavaSchool.com | Copyrights © Since 1997 | All Rights Reserved
Patents: US10956676, US7032006, US7774751, US7966093, US8051026, US8863234
Including conversational semantic decision support systems (CSDS) and bringing us closer to The message from 2040
Privacy Policy